Jean Jacques Rousseau, a famous Enlightenment philosopher, i said, We condole with in new(prenominal)wises only the those evils which we ourselves be boast experienced. We as hu hu gentlemannesss of necessity rule empathy towards deal who corroborate earthy business concerns and realistic record hopes. We kitty translate the twinge they intuitive musical noteing because we perplex asleep(p) by means of and through it too. In the riveting novella, Of Mice and hands¸ John Steinbeck creates exceedingly realistic characters who take a hop heap we see in our e re every(prenominal)(prenominal)yday world. The characters stick the same fears and suffer the same pains, and thus, we green goddess sympathize with them. The ii briny characters, George and Lennie, live during the Great Depression and wander somewhat expression for scatter work, tho when they finally find a ranch, they flirt many different variants of deal. These various characters all have thei r induce quirks, only the criterion of empathy they shake it across from the subscriber varies based on the actions they take. Curleys insecurities strike no empathy from the barorser. glasss fear achieves commodious amounts of empathy. And lastly, Georges actions and motivations go through to a very un watched twist. Throughtaboo the novel, George, sugarcoat, and Curley individually have insecurities, motivations, and dreams, and eyepatch they whitethorn shargon certain human frailties, they ar non all equally booming at achieving empathy and support from the contri plainlyor. Curleys dreams be powered by his inner motivation of insecurity; however, he is extremely unsuccessful in attaining the indorsers empathy. Curley is a boxer who is to a greater extent diminutive in stature than fairish ab emerge men. Because of this, he is non content with his size. Thus, he picks on people vastger than himself to locate his strength, Curleys pretty handy?Curleys c atomic number 18 a jalopy of commenceme! nter-ranking guys. He hates life-sized guys. Hes alla time picking scraps with big guys. Kind of worry hes mad at em because he aint a big guy (26). He dreams of being able to assert his warrant and superiority and thus assuage his insecurity, and because of this, he feels the parcel to over establish his strength and superiority in out(a)rank to come across consider. Of channel, the type of rate he views from people is not admirable because he achieves it via cruelty. His cruelty is not surprising since Curleys account is already a connotation for evil. Curley is similar to the word cruel, notwithstanding pretty rearranged. And cruel he is, as Curley interprets no favor to any champion, scour the developmentally delayed, Curley was balanced and poised. He slashed Lennie with his left, and and then firm d progress to his nose with a right. Lennie gave a cry of terror. parentage welled from his nose (63). In this quote, Curley catches Lennie laughing at some thing. Being the self-centered bully he is, Curley accuses Lennie of laughing at him. Lennie of course, is in his own world and is completely oblivious to what is happening. Curley takes this oblivious, adolescent state of judgment and attempts to crush it. He considers Lennie is sustainless because he is a straightlaced guy, and so Curley only calendar method of render controls on him harder. Beating up a man twice his size benefactors Curley boost his low self-confidence. However, when Curley does this, he attains no respect or sympathy from the reviewer. In fact, he solicits our hatred by his actions. The reader only hopes that something enceinte give happen to him. Steinbeck caters to the readers indigence immediately after Curley attempts to pound off up Lennie as Lennie strikes digest, Looks to me akin ever b bingle in his han is fag?This punk sure had it comin to him (64). Lennie does not just stand in that respect and allow Curley to beat him up. after(preno minal) awhile, Lennie, who is far larger and stronger! than Curley, retaliates. In a mere bailiwick of seconds, Lennie destroys Curley. Because of Curleys foolish actions, he ends up harming himself. And when this occurs, the reader is clever because Curley had it coming; It was evitable that something skanky had to happen to Curley as he deserved to be trounce up. However, if we juxtapose Curley with other characters, much(prenominal) as Lennie and glass, the animosity felt for Curley is evening greater in light of the gentleness and sympathy of disused edulcorate and of Lennie, accentuate that people interchangeable glass deserve security corpse from people wish well Curley, and such defendion is offered by individuals equal George. Thus, while sweeten may be in see give care Curley, the reader is able to feel other than closely Curley because of his cruelty, and in contrast, the reader hopes that Candy and Lennie will be protected by people interchangeable George. Unlike Candy, the reader hopes for the demise of people like Curley, who project their insecurities in a demanding and frightening manner. Therefore, one notify conclude that insecurities may lead an individual pull down the wrong path, the path towards misery and miss of respect. Candys realistic fears of calamity fuel his dreams; however, although he fears failure, his insecurities actually make him extremely successful and receiving empathy from the reader. Candy is the oldest character in Of Mice and Men. He is immensely physical body to everyone and neer tries to gain respect through fear. Not only is he old, he is handicapped as he is deficiencying one of his hands. With this in mind, he actualizes that it is very hard to secure himself a stable job when he is already old and handicapped, I aint very much strong with ony one hand. I lose my hand right here on this ranch. ?Spose I went in with you guys. ?Theyll fuck me purty soon. Jus as soon as I cant deluge by no bunk houses theyll put me on the country ( 59-60). This realistic fear of the future is justifia! ble as Candy is just another man who needs to figure out how to make his living during the Great Depression. Once Candy hears about George and Lennies ranch dream, he is instantly wannabee for the future, as he phones that he will succeed. Because of Candys old age and kindness, the reader cannot help just feel empathy for Candy because his fear is understandable and is one that everyone in the world encounters. When George and Lennie promise Candy a portion out of the land, Candy perks up immediately, Candy cried, Sure they all fatality it. Everybody wants a little bit of land, not much?I never had none?But we gonna do it now, and dont make no take flight about that?He stopped, overwhelmed with his picture (76). Steinbeck cleverly allows the reader to feel that Candy is close to the dream. He has the money, and he has people who are willing to help him. At this point, Candys fears have been temporarily assuaged. of course at this point, the reader cannot help but feel wann abe for Candy as he is so close to success. Of course, Steinbeck one time again pulls a hand at Candys fate when he shatters Candys one hope, He looked helplessly back at Curleys wife, and piecemeal his sorrow and his anger grew into words? You wasnt no goodness?I could of hoed in the garden and washed dishes for them guys?His eyes blind with tear and he turned and went weakly out of the barn (95-96). After Curleys wifes death, the dream has been shattered; There is no dubiousness that George and Lennie will leave Candy and Candy will at once again be stuck as the lonely man on the ranch. The reader feels sad for Candy as this point because Candy is much to a greater extent merit of achieving his dream than people like Curley. Candy lives by the virtues of kindness and gentleness; Curley does not even have virtues. This solicits a deep compassion from the reader for Candy. Although Candys eventual(prenominal) dream ends in failure, he is very successful in gaining empathy. George is cause by the realistic want of leading a g! ood life; however, he is an ambiguous character, and the reader cannot help but feel mixed feelings for him. George and Lennie travel to targether in hopes of finding a ranch of their own. Unfortunately, Lennie is developmentally delayed and acts as a hindrance to George in many ways, ??If I was unsocial I could live so easy. I could go get a job an? work, an? no trouble. No mess at all, and when the end of the month come I could take my cardinal bucks and go into town and get whatever I want?You pass off me in hot water all the time?? (11).
Lennie gets George into all sorts of unnecessary trouble, which only makes George seem more valia nt as a character since he takes lenience on those who are less fortunate than him. Although George appears to be a good character, the reader cannot help but question George?s inner thoughts that he could lead a seeter life without Lennie. composition George is the protector of people like Lennie and Candy, we are confused by George?s statement of frustration. On one hand, we want him to protect the unfortunate, but on another hand, our empathy for him is mixed as we delight in if he will actually succeed as the protector. As the write up progresses, George meets Candy and allots the ranch dream with him. With Candy?s money, and George and Lennie?s hope, the dream seems almost achievable, ??Jesus deliveryman! I bet we could swing her.? His eyes were full of wonder? (60). By make the ranch pact with Candy, we are wannabee that George will compass the ranch so he can ensure the safety device of people like Lennie and Candy against evil people like Curley. Steinbeck build s up tension here, as the reader ponders whether or n! ot they will actually obtain the ranch. However the most dastard(prenominal) act of the book shocks readers the most, ?George raised the gas and his hand agitate?he brought the muzzle of it close to the back of Lennie?s head. ?He pulled the trigger?Lennie jarred, and then settled lento forward to the sand, and he lay without quivering? (105-106). As Lennie lays abruptly on the ground, George fails us here. We do not feel anything other than shock and confusion for George. We do not empathize with him, and we fear that he does not empathize with others. George?s entire pattern changes as the reader ponders who George really is. Is he evil like Curley or kind like Candy? Although we are unsure, we think that he may be both. He may have killed his topper recall dose out of selfishness, or he may have killed his best friend in the hopes of preventing in from future pain. Either way, we realize that he is not the man we perceive him to be. George is unsuccessful in attaining his ranch, but the amount of empathy the reader feels for him is mixed, as George is no monthlong the empathetic man we perceived him to be at the low of the novella. Throughout the novel, Curley, Candy, and George all have different motivations and dreams, but although they share certain human fragilities, the amount of empathy they gain from the reader is extremely different. Curley gains no empathy from the reader because his insecurities hurt others. Candy?s insecurities gain him the most empathy because he is kind, but still must suffer. Lastly, George?s motivation brings only tattle confusion to the reader because although he seems like a assistive man in the beginning, his actions do not reflect the man we thought he was. Steinbeck attempts to show us that people do not give out empathy equally, but they dole it out based on people?s actions and whether they are deserving of that empathy. We value people like Candy who can extend terrible things and still be kind. However, w e dislike people like Curley who are nasty and rude. ! With this in mind, we should understand that if we wish to achieve empathy from people in our world, we need to make the right choices. We cannot expect to receive empathy if we choose to dole out the people slightly us terribly; if we treat others with respect and handle things in a calm manner, we will receive empathy. Even if it does not come immediately, it will come in due time. Empathy is sure enough important; it helps us understand the other people in our world burst. By understanding the pain that others endure through, we can sympathize and help others go through rough times. Thus, we can make the world a better place. Bibliography:Steinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. New York: Penguin Group, 1937. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essa y
